Formula Web Magazine News https://www.formulawebmagazine.com Formula Web Magazine - News / - Articles, specials, insights, statistics, technical analysis and video en-us Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:20:00 +0200 Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:30:00 +0200 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Vida Feed 2.0 redazione@formula1.it (Editorial Team) dmuscarella@formula1.it (Daniele Muscarella) Formula 1 sports updates https://www.formulawebmagazine.com/image/f1logosmall.png Formula Web Magazine News https://www.formulawebmagazine.com Red Bull has found the secret of 2026 F1, Ferrari has not https://www.formulawebmagazine.com/news/23616/red-bull-has-found-the-secret-of-2026-f1-ferrari-has-not This article contains technical analysis and data. If you prefer a quick read, you will find the two-minute version at the bottom.

The last three Grands Prix of the Formula 1 World Championship have been marked by the emphatic return of Red Bull and its leading light Max Verstappen, who took an excellent second place in Baku before claiming two magnificent pole positions and two victories in Malaysia and Singapore, the latter dominated in both the Sprint and the main race.

Across those events, what made the RB22 not only competitive again but even the leading force was above all a major step forward in the use of the electrical side of the Red Bull power unit. In the first part of the season, it had been regarded as the strongest in terms of the internal-combustion engine, but appeared much further behind Mercedes and Ferrari in overall management.

Is downforce no longer needed to win?

Everything we knew about Formula 1 no longer exists?

Clearly, we cannot believe the power unit alone transformed the Milton Keynes car; the profound metamorphosis of the machine, particularly in the aerodynamics of the sidepods, has made it far more predictable and, for once, usable by both drivers.

The power unit, however, is the focal point of this season. Ferrari’s SF-26 proves it: from a chassis and aerodynamic perspective, it has nothing to envy the other front-running cars, yet it was unable to win in Singapore because the advantage built up in the corners was wiped out by the RB22 under acceleration and in top speed.

Verstappen’s driving style itself has changed: the Dutchman comes off the throttle metres earlier, does not use any partial throttle, lets the car roll through the corner without seeking the limit, and is happy to lose even valuable tenths in order to charge the battery to the maximum so he can accelerate explosively and recover what he has lost with interest.

For a driver of the calibre of the four-time world champion, it may seem almost sacrilegious, but it is effective, and Verstappen, like all great champions, has adapted to it in order to return to winning ways.

Looking at the telemetry from the last two races, one observation could be that 2026 cars do not need downforce in the corners.
The relatively slow speeds at which corners are taken in order to recharge the battery suggest that, counterintuitive though it may be compared with what we have known until now, there is no need to push the search for downforce to extremes, as it would serve no purpose.

Conversely, a car capable of generating plenty of downforce also brings with it a degree of drag that becomes an unwelcome burden on the straights.

Compared with the past, the focus has shifted to traction, which must be capable of putting all the immense torque delivered by the electric motor onto the track without, at the same time, overwhelming the rear tyres.

Returning to the Ferrari example, it is a very successful car, but only when compared with the past of this sport.
Until 2030, unless something changes, the chassis qualities of the Maranello car may count for nothing.

Confirmation came at the start of the season, when an informed source told us not to expect the 2026 car to be competitive because of its lack of overall downforce.
In reality, from the very first races, that same car was among the revelations of the grid and was therefore probably judged according to parameters that hold a different value under this regulatory framework than they did in the past.

Will the current philosophy also be rewarded in 2027?

As we know, at the time of writing, all teams are working on finalising their 2027 cars and, if this reasoning is correct, they may consider focusing on this development path, but that is far from certain.

The 2027 season will feature a different split between electric and combustion power, in favour of the latter, in an effort to avoid the paradoxical situations seen in the opening races, when drivers slowed noticeably in qualifying to charge the battery.

To achieve this, the Federation has, as is known, allowed an increase in fuel energy flow of around 5%, which naturally has the side effect of increasing consumption.

We also know that races will become shorter to allow some teams, including front-runners, to avoid rebuilding their chassis to accommodate larger fuel tanks.

All these changes could, however, reduce the importance of the electrical element enough to place the chassis qualities needed to increase cornering speed back at the centre of development.

In this writer’s view, the 5% increase in fuel energy flow will not be decisive, especially in combination with the new floor regulations that will limit the overall ability to generate downforce.

The real change could instead come with the 13% increase over the current situation planned for 2028.

The teams’ dilemma remains, in any case: continue development along the lines that are paying off today, or once again place at the centre of development the car characteristics that have historically made it fast?

Cover photo www.redbullcontentpool.com

Internal photo X: Oracle Red Bull Racing

]]>
Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:30:00 +0200 https://www.formulawebmagazine.com/news/23616/red-bull-has-found-the-secret-of-2026-f1-ferrari-has-not
Wolff is lying and knows it https://www.formulawebmagazine.com/news/23615/wolff-is-lying-and-knows-it Four-time world champion Max Verstappen has won the last two races of the season in succession, while Mercedes has appeared to struggle somewhat with its upgrades between Kuala Lumpur and Marina Bay.

But how much truth is there in that picture? Is Red Bull genuinely on the rise, or has the team from Stuttgart reached a dead end?

It is a fact that Red Bull, Ferrari and McLaren are all making performance gains in F1 at the moment. Some are taking bigger steps than others, but all are on a positive trajectory. Mercedes, however, has seemed a little more human and rather less otherworldly over the past two races, since introducing its most substantial upgrade package at the Bahrain GP in Malaysia.

Mercedes uses GPs as tests, and Singapore may not have been the only one

There may, however, be an explanation for all this. For now, team principal Toto Wolff is placing all the blame on the upgrades. The changes introduced with the new package were so radical that the engineers need time to understand how to optimise the new car. After Singapore, the Stuttgart-based team's boss said they even need to adopt a new philosophy in order to find the best set-up (read here).

Mercedes, Red Bull

This is certainly an aspect that must be taken into account, but Wolff is blatantly and knowingly lying to us. How can a car that demolished the opposition at Monza with Antonelli and in Azerbaijan with Russell suffer such a collapse at certain GPs? Every top team has claimed at least two wins this year, but none of Red Bull, Ferrari or McLaren has ever won by blowing its rivals away. Mercedes has a margin in hand and occasionally takes advantage of it to conduct tests, as it did in Singapore. It was the only weekend in which we received an admission from the Austrian manager.

Never trust Toto Wolff

Management will never admit it, clearly, but it may have orchestrated everything very intelligently in order to attract even less attention. F1 often boasts about having created a highly competitive and balanced championship. The pecking order changes from race to race, and the Stuttgart-based team is riding that wave, expanding its knowledge without always worrying about the final result. After all, it has such a large margin that it can even afford the odd routine podium finish.

Wolff is lying and knows he is lying when he says that Red Bull may have caught up, or when he appears concerned about the future. The new car concept being studied by his team could represent another major step forward for 2027. The team is devoting time to it and sacrificing victories because it believes in this package. The feeling is that Mercedes has found something interesting, but we will probably only find out how much in March.


Photo: Mercedes

]]>
Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:00:00 +0200 https://www.formulawebmagazine.com/news/23615/wolff-is-lying-and-knows-it
Leclerc’s anonymity pays off: black shines brighter than gold in Singapore https://www.formulawebmagazine.com/news/23614/leclerc-s-anonymity-pays-off-black-shines-brighter-than-gold-in-singapore Tuesday 13 October. Just over a day has passed since the Singapore GP. A day spent talking about Lewis Hamilton’s strategy and what Ferrari should have done. As we reflected on the outcome of the event, we were reminded of what we had thought around the middle of last week, when Charles Leclerc, having just arrived at Marina Bay, unveiled the race suit he would wear over the weekend.

An unusual choice

Given that it was a night race, the Monegasque’s choice had seemed rather bizarre. Generally, at events held under artificial light, drivers and teams alike tend to wear and create very eye-catching designs. Audi is an example, as are many drivers’ helmets, including Hamilton’s: mirror-finish gold, designed to shine in the Singapore night. The reason is not a beauty contest, but the need to be recognisable to fans around the circuit.

Leclerc, however, chose to go against the grain. The Monegasque opted for anonymity by dressing in black, as though he wanted to go unnoticed, as if asking us to focus our attention on those seeking the spotlight. Let him work quietly in the background, alone in the night.

Ferrari, Leclerc

No distractions

We are not saying that Leclerc did not want to be among the race’s leading figures and try to win the round; quite the opposite. The results show otherwise. The point is more subtle. This year, Hamilton has enjoyed something of a revival and, buoyed by the points he has in the standings, perhaps feels a little as though he is currently the Scuderia’s ‘star’. You can see it in his manner and the way he carries himself. It is evident in the details.

Perhaps Leclerc is experiencing these feelings first-hand, and his choice of black may symbolise Charles’s desire to focus exclusively on performance, shutting out the outside world. Working hard with one objective: the good of the team. A post published by the Scuderia on Saturday night, showing the Monegasque working alone late into the night inside the garage, is the perfect image of the passion this young man brings to trying to restore Ferrari to its former glory (photos within the article, source: X, Ferrari).

GP Singapore, Ferrari, Leclerc

The Marina Bay weekend was not an easy one for him. The start was far from ideal, but he managed to take third in Sprint Qualifying, a position he would retain, despite losing out to Hamilton in Saturday’s mini-race. Something changed from Q3 onwards: he claimed P2 ahead of his team-mate, then spent the night studying the data and revising his notes in the hope that he would be the one to bring a smile to Ferrari fans’ faces.

Black shines brighter than gold when placed in the right light

On Sunday, although he desperately tried to keep pace with Verstappen in the first stint, he did not have the tools to fight for victory. Red Bull and the Dutchman had more. However, his team-mate stumbled over strategy midway through the race and, by missing the pit entry during the VSC, left Charles with all the honours for putting Ferrari on the podium behind Max.

Leclerc chose to be black as the night, in the Singapore night. Anonymity paid off, showing Charles that black, too, can shine brighter than gold when placed in the right light.


Cover photo: X, Ferrari

]]>
Tue, 13 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0200 https://www.formulawebmagazine.com/news/23614/leclerc-s-anonymity-pays-off-black-shines-brighter-than-gold-in-singapore
F1: Verstappen dominates Singapore as Hamilton takes the blame, Antonelli shines https://www.formulawebmagazine.com/news/23613/f1-verstappen-dominates-singapore-as-hamilton-takes-the-blame-antonelli-shines Now in its 17th edition, the Singapore GP is one of the most iconic and established rounds of the F1 season. The Marina Bay race delivered plenty of on-track action, owing to the controversial new rules, as well as several incidents. Over the 62 laps that counted towards the world championship, the fight for victory was straightforward, unlike the battles for the remaining positions. At the end of the Asian GP, the 17th round of the 2026 season, Verstappen took victory for Red Bull, ahead of Ferrari's Leclerc and Mercedes' Antonelli.

 

Here are the ratings

 

F1, Verstappen dominates Singapore as Hamilton takes the blame, Antonelli shines

Red Bull: 10

A solid weekend for Red Bull, claiming their second consecutive victory. They are improving and deserve great credit.

Verstappen: 10
A superb weekend for Max, capped off with first place. He is back at the top, and there to stay.

Hadjar: 8
His race ended in P10. Fast and error-free, he fought back from the rear. He did his job well.

 

F1, Verstappen dominates Singapore as Hamilton takes the blame, Antonelli shines

Ferrari: 8

A solid weekend for Ferrari, with the SF-26 improving despite a few imperfections. Keep it up.

Leclerc: 9
A wholehearted weekend for Charles, finishing P2 after a fine race. The maximum possible within the limitations of the SF-26.

Hamilton: 6
Not a great weekend for Lewis, sixth after the wrong pit-wall call. He takes the blame.

 

F1, Verstappen dominates Singapore as Hamilton takes the blame, Antonelli shines

Mercedes: 7.5

A mediocre showing from Mercedes, improving with enigmatic upgrades. One to review.

Russell: 7
A good race for George, who fought his way through the field in his Mercedes. Good, but he drops more points.

Antonelli: 8
A solid, clinical race from Kimi after a poor qualifying session. Third, fortunate and now really flying...

 

F1, Verstappen dominates Singapore as Hamilton takes the blame, Antonelli shines

Mclaren: 5.5

A mediocre weekend for McLaren, which “threw away” points through incidents and a lack of pace.

Norris: 7
A good weekend for Lando, fourth despite limited pace. The McLaren did not perform well...

Piastri: 6.5
A passable weekend for Oscar, with a revised but elusive car. P5 was the maximum.

 

Aston Martin: 4

A dreadful weekend for Aston, with a slow and unreliable car. Ups and downs.

Alonso: 6
Fernando fought with heart in a struggling Aston. There was little he could do, and he finished P16.

Stroll: N.C.
An unrateable race for Lance, with a struggling and unreliable Aston. Retired.

 

Alpine: 5

A negative performance from Alpine, with a slow car. Poor, they need to put the whole weekend behind them.

Gasly: 6
His race ended without points, with little pace and bad luck. A shame, but he will respond.

Colapinto: N.C.
In his second year in F1, he is improving, but there was little he could do in Singapore with a slow Alpine. Retired.

 

Racing Bulls: 7

A weekend of two halves for RB, with a quick car but only one driver scoring points. Well done.

Lindblad: 5
His race ended at the back after bad luck. Behind Lawson, needs reviewing.

Lawson: 8.5
A gritty race from Liam, back in the VCARB with pace and no mistakes. Valuable points. P7.

 

Audi: 6

A weekend of two halves for Audi, in the points despite incidents. Reliable, but inconsistent...

Hulkenberg: 8
His race ended in P8 without any flashes but with plenty of substance. He always gets the maximum out of it.

Bortoleto: N.C.
An unrateable day for Gabriel, who retired in an Audi that was not on form.

 

Haas: 5.5

A mediocre three days for Haas: passable in the race, but out of the points. Ups and downs...

Ocon: 6
A good weekend for Esteban in a mediocre Haas. P13, after the dismissal...

Bearman: 7.5
Ollie's progress continues. He pushed and fought, but could not convert it. The Haas did not help. P12.

 

Williams: 5

Williams did not impress. Once again out of the points. Plenty of difficulties and mistakes.

Sainz: 6
A good weekend for Carlos, but no points with a struggling Williams. A shame. P14.

Albon: 5.5
An unrateable day for Alex. He tried to fight, but the Williams did not help. P18, what a struggle.

 

Cadillac: 5

Cadillac's difficult progress continues, at the back and without points. Plenty of work to do...

Perez: 6
He returns to F1, but the Cadillac does not help. He finished last without any flashes or fight. It will be a long road.

Bottas: 5.5
He returns to F1 but makes no impact, hampered by a slow Cadillac. Nineteenth at the finish.

 

With the Singapore GP now behind them, F1 will return in two weeks' time at Austin for the United States GP.